MarchGill...

Comment

Comment by Matthew J. Breuer on June 24, 2011 at 9:30pm

Bruce is correct, it is indeed a wide-angle lens, however it's not a fish-eye lens, nor above standard wide-angle. I, much like Bruce C., have learned how to hold fish, I had to with my ape-like arms and giant hands. Like I told a guy who tried giving me a hard time last week.... why would I make my fish look smaller? ;)

Comment by Chris Salmon on March 17, 2011 at 7:18am

Sweet gill.

Comment by Andre Sturkey on March 11, 2011 at 8:49pm

Good Shot

Comment by Jim Gronaw on March 10, 2011 at 3:29pm

You guys might not know this, but Matthew here actually has a cuff-length on his right arm of 5 feet, 7 inches. His left arm is normal, hence, he always holds his fish with his right arm.

Just kiddin'! Ha-Ha!

Actually, this photo is way cool, and I was going to give and estimate of 26 lbs. and 10 ounces for this fish. But at 10.5 inches, that would be quite a stretch.

Comment by Zach Pierce on March 10, 2011 at 10:42am

How are you holding the fish, I do not see any hands or anything?

Comment by Bruce Condello on March 10, 2011 at 10:20am

Wide angle lens.  ( or wid-ER ) anyway.  Pictures can be fun when you're playing with perspective. :-)

Comment by Zach Pierce on March 10, 2011 at 6:12am

Why does that fish look way to large for the pic?

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page